ΆΓ Step in the right direction
Korea Herald
2001. 4. 18
On the whole, the Korean government has
reason to be proud. It's made a lot of progress towards
improving the investment regime in Korea since the
debilitating financial crisis of 1997.
By the end of 2000, foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows
reached their highest level ever of US$15.69 billion. The
lifting of various investment barriers such as the 1998
revision of the Foreigner's Land Acquisition Act and capital
market reforms eliminating or raising ceilings on foreign
equity ownership and on foreign investment in the government,
corporate, and special bond markets have all been well
received by foreign investors.
This positive mood is reflected in the recently published
2001 National Trade Estimate (NTE) report. It acknowledged the
recent efforts by Seoul to improve the investment climate but
also cautioned that the progress achieved could be undermined
if additional changes are not made to enhance labor-market
flexibility, intellectual property rights, transparency in the
regulatory environment, and structural reform, and market
opening.
For example, the USTR said the limited opening of Korea's
automobile and steel markets and continued state intervention
in the economy were obstacles hindering further FDI inflows
into Korea. Perhaps more damaging than the 8 percent tariff
rate applied to auto imports and the burdensome motor vehicle
standards and certification procedures is the negative
perception that many Koreans harbor against foreign cars.
According to a survey conducted last month, attitudes toward
imported cars have worsened even though the Korean government
is no longer directly involved in anti-import campaigns. The
report did note that the Korean government is trying to
reverse this, sponsoring the first-ever Korea Import Motor
Show in Seoul last year. Lingering prejudice only dissuades
foreign automobile companies from doing business in Korea,
thus inhibiting FDI and depriving the domestic auto market of
the ability to upgrade through access to foreign autos and
management know-how.
In the steel market, the USTR urged Korea to promote
increased international competition and to eliminate
government intervention in the financial sector. This includes
the complete privatization of POSCO, in which the Korean
Government holds a 4.1 percent stake, and finalization of the
sale of Hanbo Steel and to have it operated without Korean
Government direction or support.
The USTR noted Korea Development Bank's (KDB) purchase of
about $400 million worth of bonds issued by ailing Hyundai
Electronics Industries, which continues to suffer from
liquidity shortages, as an example of the questionable
progress of reform efforts. Continued government support, in
the form of subsidies only serves to undermine foreigner as
well as domestic consumer confidence in the Korean economy and
the drive towards a market-oriented economy, thereby
inhibiting FDI. Such interventionist practices are also
inconsistent with the fair trade principles of the World Trade
Organization (WTO) of which Korea is a member.
Regarding the USTR paper, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
and Trade was quick to point out that the USTR did not raise
any new complaints against the Korean government while holding
that some of the issues appeared to stem from a lack of
understanding of Korea on the part of the U.S.
What these concerns demonstrate is that economic
restructuring is by no means complete. More important than the
superficial changes made to laws and regulations is the
lingering protectionist sentiment stemming from the lack of an
international mindset among the Korean people. For example, a
survey released in February 2001 conducted by an international
marketing firm revealed that attitudes toward imported cars
have worsened since 1999. According to the survey, the main
factor driving down import car sales in Korea is social
pressure and the negative public image of foreign cars in
Korea. This only hampers Korea's transition to a market-based
economy where Korean firms are adversely sheltered from
competition at the international level. Korea must overcome
its perception of being a "Hermit Kingdom" if it wishes to
attract the best foreign-invested firms laden with capital,
cutting-edge high-technology and management know-how skills.
What strategy should the government pursue to ensure a
robust economy and high FDI levels? Based on last year's FDI
figures, reinvestment from existing foreign investors totaled
US$9.38 billion, over four times 1999's level, and comprising
about 60 percent of total FDI for the year 2000. This
indicates the greater significance of aftercare service
compared to the initial setup services provided to foreign
investors. Thus, the Office of the Investment Ombudsman (OIO),
which caters to the needs of existing foreign investors, is
definitely a determinant of FDI into Korea.
An important part of what the OIO does is simply addressing
the daily concerns of the families of foreign investors. This
can range from providing adequate educational facilities,
hospitals, affordable rental housing, and grocery markets
packed with foreign foods. Paying attention to these details
is an essential ingredient to successfully completing the
economic restructuring process so that foreign investors can
feel confident in doing business in Korea. Such quality of
life issues are just as important as objective criteria such
as geographical location, size of domestic market, quality of
industrial base and infrastructure, and the quality of and
educational level of human capital.
What the USTR report demonstrates is that Korea must not
only strive toward conforming to international standards in
the corporate, financial, and public sectors but this effort
must be coupled with a change in mindset reflecting liberal
international norms. This fundamental shift in thinking is a
necessary element upon which the success of the economic
restructuring process hinges. While addressing the needs of
the foreign investor, the broader role of the OIO is to act as
a catalyst spurring on Korea's integration into the global
economy by facilitating the entry of foreign-invested
companies and educating the Korean people on the benefits of
FDI.
|